Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)

Hashrate 53.0 TH/s Power 2,385 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) Specification Auradine Teraflux AI3680
53.0 TH/s Hashrate 375.0 TH/s
2,385 W Power Consumption 5,625 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
Noise Level 55 dB
9,500.0 kg Weight
8,138 BTU/hr BTU Output 19,193 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00002439 BTC $1.90
Daily Electricity -$5.72
Daily Profit -$3.82
Monthly -$114.61
Yearly -$1,394.46

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.47
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$0.03
Monthly -$0.94
Yearly -$11.45

Based on BTC price of $78,048 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 608% more hashrate (53.0 vs 375.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 608% more hashrate (53.0 vs 375.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 58% better power draw (2,385 vs 5,625 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 67% better efficiency (45.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 136% more heat output (8,138 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) Metric Auradine Teraflux AI3680
$274 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.82 Daily net profit -$0.03
-$1,668 Net after 1 year -$11
-$3,063 Net after 2 years -$23
-$4,457 Net after 3 years -$34
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-0.03/day compared to $-3.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 30.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficiency (45.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).