Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 74.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Power Consumption | 3,330 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $77,862 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th), which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 24% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,330 W). The StrongU Hornbill H8 holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and StrongU Hornbill H8 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- StrongU Hornbill H8 32% more hashrate (56.0 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 24% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,330 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 17% better weight (9,500 vs 11,500 kg)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 32% more heat output (8,598 vs 11,362 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$4.04 | Daily net profit | -$5.34 |
| -$1,888 | Net after 1 year | -$3,149 |
| -$3,363 | Net after 2 years | -$5,099 |
| -$4,838 | Net after 3 years | -$7,048 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) is more profitable at $-4.04/day compared to $-5.34/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the StrongU Hornbill H8 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and StrongU Hornbill H8 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.