Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 115.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.4 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 7% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,500 W). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 5% more hashrate (110 vs 115 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 7% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 3% better efficiency (29.6 vs 30.4 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 8% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $609 |
| -$3.80 | Daily net profit | -$4.22 |
| -$1,746 | Net after 1 year | -$2,148 |
| -$3,133 | Net after 2 years | -$3,687 |
| -$4,519 | Net after 3 years | -$5,226 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner A1326Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)29.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) is more profitable at $-3.80/day compared to $-4.22/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner A1326: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326?
The Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner A1326 runs at 30.4 J/TH — a difference of 0.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficiency (29.6 vs 30.4 J/TH).