Antminer S19 Pro+ vs Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 Pro+ | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 120.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 3,050 W |
| 28.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 13,200.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,407 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 Pro+
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S19 Pro+, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 20% more hashrate (120 vs 100 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 Pro+'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 Pro+ and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 20% more hashrate (120 vs 100 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 9% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,050 W)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 8% better efficiency (28.0 vs 30.5 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 100% better weight (14.4 vs 13,200.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 10% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,407 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 Pro+ 282% more home mining score (84.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 Pro+ | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $600 |
| -$3.70 | Daily net profit | -$3.68 |
| -$4,350 | Net after 1 year | -$1,944 |
| -$5,700 | Net after 2 years | -$3,288 |
| -$7,050 | Net after 3 years | -$4,632 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 Pro+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 Pro+28.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 Pro+ vs Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) is more profitable at $-3.68/day compared to $-3.70/day for the Antminer S19 Pro+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Pro+ or Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 Pro+ or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S19 Pro+ and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer S19 Pro+ runs at 28.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) runs at 30.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (28.0 vs 30.5 J/TH).