Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19 Pro+

Antminer S19 Pro+

Hashrate 120.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 28.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer S19j Pro

Antminer S19j Pro

Hashrate 100.0 TH/s Power 3,050 W Efficiency 30.5 J/TH

Antminer S19 Pro+ vs Antminer S19j Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 Pro+ Specification Antminer S19j Pro
120.0 TH/s Hashrate 100.0 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 3,050 W
28.0 J/TH Efficiency 30.5 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
14.4 kg Weight 13.2 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,407 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19 Pro+

Daily Revenue 0.00005695 BTC $4.51
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$3.55
Monthly -$106.63
Yearly -$1,297.28

Antminer S19j Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00004745 BTC $3.76
Daily Electricity -$7.32
Daily Profit -$3.56
Monthly -$106.85
Yearly -$1,300.06

Based on BTC price of $79,195 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S19 Pro+ wins on 2 of 3 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 20% more hashrate (120 vs 100 TH/s). The Antminer S19j Pro claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S19 Pro+ — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S19 Pro+ and Antminer S19j Pro sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer S19 Pro+ 20% more hashrate (120 vs 100 TH/s)
  • Antminer S19j Pro 9% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,050 W)
  • Antminer S19 Pro+ 8% better efficiency (28.0 vs 30.5 J/TH)
  • Antminer S19j Pro 8% better weight (14.4 vs 13.2 kg)
  • Antminer S19 Pro+ 10% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,407 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer S19 Pro+ Metric Antminer S19j Pro
$3,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,500
-$3.55 Daily net profit -$3.56
-$4,297 Net after 1 year -$3,800
-$5,595 Net after 2 years -$5,100
-$6,892 Net after 3 years -$6,400
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19 Pro+

28.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer S19 Pro+ or Antminer S19j Pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 Pro+ is more profitable at $-3.55/day compared to $-3.56/day for the Antminer S19j Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S19 Pro+ or the Antminer S19j Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S19 Pro+ or the Antminer S19j Pro?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 Pro+ and Antminer S19j Pro?

The Antminer S19 Pro+ runs at 28.0 J/TH while the Antminer S19j Pro runs at 30.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (28.0 vs 30.5 J/TH).