Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S21+

Antminer S21+

Hashrate 216.0 TH/s Power 3,564 W Efficiency 16.5 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M60S++

Whatsminer M60S++

Hashrate 220.0 TH/s Power 3,960 W Efficiency 18.0 J/TH

Antminer S21+ vs Whatsminer M60S++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S21+ Specification Whatsminer M60S++
216.0 TH/s Hashrate 220.0 TH/s
3,564 W Power Consumption 3,960 W
16.5 J/TH Efficiency 18.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
15.0 kg Weight 14.0 kg
12,160 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,512 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S21+

Daily Revenue 0.00009940 BTC $7.65
Daily Electricity -$8.55
Daily Profit -$0.90
Monthly -$27.05
Yearly -$329.09

Whatsminer M60S++

Daily Revenue 0.00010124 BTC $7.79
Daily Electricity -$9.50
Daily Profit -$1.71
Monthly -$51.31
Yearly -$624.27

Based on BTC price of $76,982 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S21+ wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 10% better power draw (3,564 vs 3,960 W) in the Antminer S21+'s favour. The Whatsminer M60S++ holds the edge in hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S21+ — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer S21+ and Whatsminer M60S++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Whatsminer M60S++ 2% more hashrate (216 vs 220 TH/s)
  • Antminer S21+ 10% better power draw (3,564 vs 3,960 W)
  • Antminer S21+ 8% better efficiency (16.5 vs 18.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M60S++ 7% better weight (15.0 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M60S++ 11% more heat output (12,160 vs 13,512 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer S21+ Metric Whatsminer M60S++
$6,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $7,000
-$0.90 Daily net profit -$1.71
-$6,829 Net after 1 year -$7,624
-$7,158 Net after 2 years -$8,249
-$7,487 Net after 3 years -$8,873
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S21+

16.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer S21+ or Whatsminer M60S++ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S21+ is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-1.71/day for the Whatsminer M60S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer S21+ vs Whatsminer M60S++: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer S21+ vs Whatsminer M60S++: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Antminer S21+ vs Whatsminer M60S++: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer S21+ runs at 16.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH — a difference of 1.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (16.5 vs 18.0 J/TH).