Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 PH/s | Hashrate | 84.0 TH/s |
| 11,020 W | Power Consumption | 3,150 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 37.5 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 37,600 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 1281% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 84.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) claws back ground on power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U and Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 1281% more hashrate (1,160.0 vs 84.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 71% better power draw (11,020 vs 3,150 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 75% better efficiency (9.5 vs 37.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 250% more heat output (37,600 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 100% more home mining score (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $7,988 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $179 |
| $15.77 | Daily net profit | -$4.50 |
| -$2,231 | Net after 1 year | -$1,822 |
| +$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$3,466 |
| +$9,282 | Net after 3 years | -$5,109 |
| Pays for itself in ~17 months at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U$20.27/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3UScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is more profitable at $15.77/day compared to $-4.50/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U or Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U runs at 9.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) runs at 37.5 J/TH — a difference of 28.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficiency (9.5 vs 37.5 J/TH).