Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 50.0 TH/s |
| 5,510 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 9.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 11,400.0 kg |
| 18,800 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Based on BTC price of $78,346 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1060% more hashrate (580.0 vs 50.0 TH/s). That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 1060% more hashrate (580.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 41% better power draw (5,510 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 85% better efficiency (9.5 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 100% better weight (13.5 vs 11,400.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 70% more heat output (18,800 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 36% more home mining score (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,995 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,255 |
| $7.69 | Daily net profit | -$6.00 |
| -$10,189 | Net after 1 year | -$3,444 |
| -$7,383 | Net after 2 years | -$5,633 |
| -$4,578 | Net after 3 years | -$7,822 |
| Takes ~4.6 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd$13.68/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 HydScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is more profitable at $7.69/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd runs at 9.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 55.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (9.5 vs 65.0 J/TH).