Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Hashrate 50.0 TH/s Power 2,000 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe Ultra

Bitaxe Ultra

Hashrate 500.0 GH/s Power 15 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Ultra

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) Specification Bitaxe Ultra
50.0 TH/s Hashrate 500.0 GH/s
2,000 W Power Consumption 15 W
40.0 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
70 dB Noise Level 35 dB
7.5 kg Weight 0.3 kg
6,824 BTU/hr BTU Output 51 BTU/hr
42/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$3.00
Monthly -$89.98
Yearly -$1,094.80

Bitaxe Ultra

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.02
Monthly -$0.54
Yearly -$6.57

Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Ultra edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 15.0 W). That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitaxe Ultra — wins on 4 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 9900% more hashrate (50.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 99% better power draw (2,000.0 vs 15.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 25% better efficiency (40.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 50% better noise (70.0 vs 35.0 dB)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 96% better weight (7.5 vs 0.3 kg)
  • Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 13228% more heat output (6,824.0 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 67% more home mining score (42.0 vs 70.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) Metric Bitaxe Ultra
$600 Upfront cost (MSRP) $79
-$3.00 Daily net profit -$0.02
-$1,695 Net after 1 year -$86
-$2,790 Net after 2 years -$92
-$3,884 Net after 3 years -$99
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Ultra

Score: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Ultra

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe Ultra?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-3.00/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Ultra: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Bitaxe Ultra?

The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Bitaxe Ultra?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 10.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (40.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).