Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer T17+

Antminer T17+

Hashrate 64.0 TH/s Power 3,200 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer T17+ Specification Innosilicon T3+ 52T
64.0 TH/s Hashrate 52.0 TH/s
3,200 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
50.0 J/TH Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
10.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
10,918 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer T17+

Daily Revenue 0.00003037 BTC $2.40
Daily Electricity -$7.68
Daily Profit -$5.28
Monthly -$158.26
Yearly -$1,925.49

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002468 BTC $1.95
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.77
Monthly -$142.99
Yearly -$1,739.66

Based on BTC price of $79,177 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T17+ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 23% more hashrate (64.0 vs 52.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon T3+ 52T holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer T17+ — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer T17+ and Innosilicon T3+ 52T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer T17+ 23% more hashrate (64.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 13% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,800 W)
  • Antminer T17+ 7% better efficiency (50.0 vs 53.9 J/TH)
  • Antminer T17+ 100% better weight (10.0 vs 10,000.0 kg)
  • Antminer T17+ 14% more heat output (10,918 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer T17+ 282% more home mining score (84.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T17+

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T17+

50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer T17+ or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T3+ 52T is more profitable at $-4.77/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer T17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer T17+ or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer T17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 3.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (50.0 vs 53.9 J/TH).