Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer T17+ | Specification | Innosilicon T3+ 52T |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 52.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,800 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 53.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,554 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer T17+
Innosilicon T3+ 52T
Based on BTC price of $79,177 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T17+ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 23% more hashrate (64.0 vs 52.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon T3+ 52T holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer T17+ and Innosilicon T3+ 52T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer T17+ 23% more hashrate (64.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T 13% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,800 W)
- Antminer T17+ 7% better efficiency (50.0 vs 53.9 J/TH)
- Antminer T17+ 100% better weight (10.0 vs 10,000.0 kg)
- Antminer T17+ 14% more heat output (10,918 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T17+ 282% more home mining score (84.0 vs 22.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T17+50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer T17+ or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T3+ 52T is more profitable at $-4.77/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer T17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer T17+ or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer T17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 3.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (50.0 vs 53.9 J/TH).
Compare Antminer T17+ with...
Compare Innosilicon T3+ 52T with...
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
