Antminer T19 vs Whatsminer M60
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer T19 | Specification | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 84.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 170.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Power Consumption | 3,383 W |
| 37.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,543 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer T19
Whatsminer M60
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M60 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 102% more hashrate (84.0 vs 170.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M60's favour. That said, the Antminer T19 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer T19 and Whatsminer M60 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60 102% more hashrate (84.0 vs 170.0 TH/s)
- Antminer T19 7% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,383 W)
- Whatsminer M60 47% better efficiency (37.5 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60 6% better weight (14.4 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M60 7% more heat output (10,748 vs 11,543 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T19 133% more home mining score (84.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer T19 | Metric | Whatsminer M60 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,800 |
| -$4.50 | Daily net profit | -$1.93 |
| -$3,443 | Net after 1 year | -$5,504 |
| -$5,086 | Net after 2 years | -$6,207 |
| -$6,728 | Net after 3 years | -$6,911 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T19Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M6019.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer T19 or Whatsminer M60 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60 is more profitable at $-1.93/day compared to $-4.50/day for the Antminer T19. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer T19 vs Whatsminer M60: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer T19 vs Whatsminer M60: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer T19 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M60). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer T19 and Whatsminer M60 on J/TH?
The Antminer T19 runs at 37.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 17.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficiency (37.5 vs 19.9 J/TH).