iPollo B1L vs Ebang Ebit E11++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 44.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 1,980 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,756 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
Ebang Ebit E11++
Based on BTC price of $77,866 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Ebang Ebit E11++ comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 34% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,980 W). The iPollo B1L holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo B1L and Ebang Ebit E11++ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo B1L 32% more hashrate (58.0 vs 44.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 34% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,980 W)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 13% better efficiency (51.7 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- iPollo B1L 52% more heat output (10,236 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E11++ 27% more home mining score (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | Ebang Ebit E11++ |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.12 | Daily net profit | -$3.18 |
| -$2,299 | Net after 1 year | -$1,159 |
| -$4,169 | Net after 2 years | -$2,318 |
| -$6,038 | Net after 3 years | -$3,477 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E11++Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Ebang Ebit E11++45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo B1L or Ebang Ebit E11++ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E11++ is more profitable at $-3.18/day compared to $-5.12/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or Ebang Ebit E11++?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the Ebang Ebit E11++?
The Ebang Ebit E11++ scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo B1L and Ebang Ebit E11++ on J/TH?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E11++ runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 6.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 13% better efficiency (51.7 vs 45.0 J/TH).