iPollo B1L vs iPollo V1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | iPollo V1 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 3.6 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Power Consumption | 3,100 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 861,111.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 13,000.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
iPollo V1
Based on BTC price of $74,273 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the iPollo B1L offers 100% better efficiency at 51.7 J/TH compared to the iPollo V1 at 861,111.1 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo B1L or iPollo V1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo B1L is more profitable at $-5.33/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or iPollo V1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo B1L or iPollo V1?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and iPollo V1?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH — a difference of 861,059.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.