Bitaxe Supra vs Innosilicon T3+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Supra | Specification | Innosilicon T3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 67.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 49.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Supra
Innosilicon T3+
Based on BTC price of $76,751 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Supra comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,300.0 W). The Innosilicon T3+ claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe Supra and Innosilicon T3+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Innosilicon T3+ 11067% more hashrate (0.6 vs 67.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Supra 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,300.0 W)
- Bitaxe Supra 49% better efficiency (25.0 vs 49.3 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Supra 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Supra 98% better weight (0.3 vs 12.0 kg)
- Innosilicon T3+ 21891% more heat output (51.2 vs 11,259.6 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Supra 94% more home mining score (70.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitaxe Supra | Metric | Innosilicon T3+ |
|---|---|---|
| $89 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$0.01 | Daily net profit | -$5.55 |
| -$94 | Net after 1 year | -$3,227 |
| -$100 | Net after 2 years | -$5,254 |
| -$105 | Net after 3 years | -$7,281 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe SupraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Supra25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitaxe Supra or Innosilicon T3+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Supra is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-5.55/day for the Innosilicon T3+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitaxe Supra or the Innosilicon T3+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Supra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe Supra or the Innosilicon T3+?
The Bitaxe Supra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Innosilicon T3+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitaxe Supra vs Innosilicon T3+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitaxe Supra runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ runs at 49.3 J/TH — a difference of 24.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficiency (25.0 vs 49.3 J/TH).