iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs Goldshell KD Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Specification | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 32.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 12,200.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1 Max
Goldshell KD Box II
Based on BTC price of $78,086 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD Box II comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). The standout gap is 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W) in the Goldshell KD Box II's favour. That said, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and Goldshell KD Box II sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 540% more hashrate (32.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD Box II 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KD Box II 20% better efficiency (100.0 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD Box II 100% better weight (12,200.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 Max 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD Box II 55% more home mining score (22.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K1 Max | Metric | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $1,250 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $236 |
| -$6.53 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$3,633 | Net after 1 year | -$521 |
| -$6,017 | Net after 2 years | -$806 |
| -$8,400 | Net after 3 years | -$1,090 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD Box IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Box II80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or the Goldshell KD Box II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD Box II is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-6.53/day for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 Max vs Goldshell KD Box II: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 Max or Goldshell KD Box II?
The Goldshell KD Box II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-K1 Max and Goldshell KD Box II on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-K1 Max runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Box II runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 20.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficiency (100.0 vs 80.0 J/TH).