iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-KS Max, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 10900% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). The Iceriver KS0 holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and Iceriver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 10900% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (3,400.0 vs 65.0 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 52% better efficiency (309 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 80% better weight (12.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 5130% more heat output (11,601 vs 222 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the Iceriver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Iceriver KS0?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KS0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 340.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficiency (309 vs 650 J/TH).