iBeLink BM-N1 vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 363.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,900.0 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N1
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK Lite comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). The standout gap is 50% better power draw (2,400 vs 1,200 W) in the Goldshell CK Lite's favour. The iBeLink BM-N1 holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N1 and Goldshell CK Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-N1 5% more hashrate (6.6 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 50% better power draw (2,400 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 48% better efficiency (364 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK Lite 18% better weight (9,900 vs 8,100 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N1 100% more heat output (8,189 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Lite 19% more home mining score (26.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$5.52 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$2,016 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$4,031 | Net after 2 years | -$2,685 |
| -$6,047 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-N1 vs Goldshell CK Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-N1 or Goldshell CK Lite?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N1 or Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell CK Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N1 and Goldshell CK Lite on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 173.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficiency (364 vs 190 J/TH).