iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Specification | iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 2,400 W | Power Consumption | 290 W |
| 363.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 58.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,900.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 8,189 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 990 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N1
iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). The standout gap is 88% better power draw (2,400 vs 290 W) in the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)'s favour. That said, the iBeLink BM-N1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-N1 32% more hashrate (6.6 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 88% better power draw (2,400 vs 290 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 84% better efficiency (363.6 vs 58.0 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 100% better weight (9,900.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N1 728% more heat output (8,189 vs 990 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 19% more home mining score (26.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-N1 | Metric | iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $288 |
| -$5.52 | Daily net profit | -$0.52 |
| -$2,016 | Net after 1 year | -$476 |
| -$4,031 | Net after 2 years | -$665 |
| -$6,047 | Net after 3 years | -$853 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)58.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) is more profitable at $-0.52/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink K3 mini (5TH): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink K3 mini (5TH): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)?
The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) runs at 58.0 J/TH — a difference of 305.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (363.6 vs 58.0 J/TH).