iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 290 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 58.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 990 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better power draw (3,400 vs 290 W). The iBeLink BM-KS Max claws back ground on hashrate and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 120% more hashrate (11.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 91% better power draw (3,400 vs 290 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 81% better efficiency (309.1 vs 58.0 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) 82% better weight (12.2 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 1072% more heat output (11,601 vs 990 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $288 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.52 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$476 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$665 |
| -$10,300 | Net after 3 years | -$853 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-KS MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)58.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) is more profitable at $-0.52/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink K3 mini (5TH): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink K3 mini (5TH): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink K3 mini (5TH) runs at 58.0 J/TH — a difference of 251.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (309.1 vs 58.0 J/TH).