Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink BM-S1

iBeLink BM-S1

Hashrate 6.8 TH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 345.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink BM-S1 Max

iBeLink BM-S1 Max

Hashrate 12.0 TH/s Power 3,150 W Efficiency 262.5 J/TH

iBeLink BM-S1 vs iBeLink BM-S1 Max

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-S1 Specification iBeLink BM-S1 Max
6.8 TH/s Hashrate 12.0 TH/s
2,350 W Power Consumption 3,150 W
345.6 J/TH Efficiency 262.5 J/TH
Noise Level
9,000.0 kg Weight 9,000.0 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,748 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithm Blake2b-sia
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-S1

Daily Revenue 0.00000313 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.40
Monthly -$161.97
Yearly -$1,970.69

iBeLink BM-S1 Max

Daily Revenue 0.00000552 BTC $0.43
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$7.13
Monthly -$214.05
Yearly -$2,604.27

Based on BTC price of $76,967 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-S1 Max comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 76% more hashrate (6.8 vs 12.0 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-S1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink BM-S1 Max — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 and iBeLink BM-S1 Max sit on each measurable spec:

  • iBeLink BM-S1 Max 76% more hashrate (6.8 vs 12.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 25% better power draw (2,350 vs 3,150 W)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 Max 24% better efficiency (346 vs 263 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 Max 34% more heat output (8,018 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink BM-S1 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iBeLink BM-S1 Metric iBeLink BM-S1 Max
$768 Upfront cost (MSRP) $899
-$5.40 Daily net profit -$7.13
-$2,739 Net after 1 year -$3,503
-$4,709 Net after 2 years -$6,108
-$6,680 Net after 3 years -$8,712
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink BM-S1

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-S1 Max

262.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S1 Max?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-7.13/day for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S1 Max better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S1 or the iBeLink BM-S1 Max?

The iBeLink BM-S1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1 Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S1 and iBeLink BM-S1 Max?

The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S1 Max runs at 262.5 J/TH — a difference of 83.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficiency (346 vs 263 J/TH).