iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell HS5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Specification | Goldshell HS5 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.7 TH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 2,650 W |
| 345.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 981.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,000.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,042 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1
Goldshell HS5
Based on BTC price of $76,989 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-S1, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 65% better efficiency (346 vs 981 J/TH) in the iBeLink BM-S1's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell HS5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-S1 152% more hashrate (6.8 vs 2.7 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S1 11% better power draw (2,350 vs 2,650 W)
- iBeLink BM-S1 65% better efficiency (346 vs 981 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS5 6% better weight (9,000 vs 8,500 kg)
- Goldshell HS5 13% more heat output (8,018 vs 9,042 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S1 18% more home mining score (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Metric | Goldshell HS5 |
|---|---|---|
| $768 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $949 |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$6.26 |
| -$2,739 | Net after 1 year | -$3,235 |
| -$4,709 | Net after 2 years | -$5,522 |
| -$6,680 | Net after 3 years | -$7,808 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S1345.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell HS5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S1 is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-6.26/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or the Goldshell HS5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell HS5?
The iBeLink BM-S1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell HS5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH — a difference of 635.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (346 vs 981 J/TH).