Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 12.0 TH/s |
| 215 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 2,000.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK5 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1043% more hashrate (1.1 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK5's favour. The Goldshell CK-BOX claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK5 1043% more hashrate (1.1 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 91% better power draw (215 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK5 2% better efficiency (205 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 76% better weight (2,000 vs 8,500 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 1016% more heat output (734 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 19% more home mining score (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$365 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$539 | Net after 2 years | -$4,887 |
| -$714 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK5200.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Goldshell CK5?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Goldshell CK5?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK5 on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficiency (205 vs 200 J/TH).