Goldshell CK Lite vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK Lite | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK Lite
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 85% better power draw (1,200 vs 185 W). The Goldshell CK Lite holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK Lite and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK Lite 385% more hashrate (6.3 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 85% better power draw (1,200 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 25% better efficiency (190 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK Lite 549% more heat output (4,094 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 6% more home mining score (31.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK Lite | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $748 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$1,716 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$2,684 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$3,653 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK Lite or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK Lite or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell CK Lite or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell CK Lite vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 48.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficiency (190 vs 142 J/TH).