Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

DragonMint T1

DragonMint T1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,480 W Efficiency 92.5 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M60S++

Whatsminer M60S++

Hashrate 220.0 TH/s Power 3,960 W Efficiency 18.0 J/TH

DragonMint T1 vs Whatsminer M60S++

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

DragonMint T1 Specification Whatsminer M60S++
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 220.0 TH/s
1,480 W Power Consumption 3,960 W
92.5 J/TH Efficiency 18.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
6.0 kg Weight 14.0 kg
5,050 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,512 BTU/hr
48/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Halong Mining Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

DragonMint T1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.57
Daily Electricity -$3.55
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.35
Yearly -$1,087.05

Whatsminer M60S++

Daily Revenue 0.00010124 BTC $7.89
Daily Electricity -$9.50
Daily Profit -$1.61
Monthly -$48.43
Yearly -$589.27

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M60S++ edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 1275% more hashrate (16.0 vs 220.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M60S++'s favour. That said, the DragonMint T1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Whatsminer M60S++ — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The DragonMint T1 and Whatsminer M60S++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Whatsminer M60S++ 1275% more hashrate (16.0 vs 220.0 TH/s)
  • DragonMint T1 63% better power draw (1,480 vs 3,960 W)
  • Whatsminer M60S++ 81% better efficiency (92.5 vs 18.0 J/TH)
  • DragonMint T1 57% better weight (6.0 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M60S++ 168% more heat output (5,050 vs 13,512 BTU/hr)
  • DragonMint T1 60% more home mining score (48.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

DragonMint T1 Metric Whatsminer M60S++
Upfront cost (MSRP) $7,000
-$2.98 Daily net profit -$1.61
-$1,087 Net after 1 year -$7,589
-$2,174 Net after 2 years -$8,179
-$3,261 Net after 3 years -$8,768
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

DragonMint T1

Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M60S++

18.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the DragonMint T1 or Whatsminer M60S++ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S++ is more profitable at $-1.61/day compared to $-2.98/day for the DragonMint T1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

DragonMint T1 vs Whatsminer M60S++: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the DragonMint T1 or the Whatsminer M60S++?

The DragonMint T1 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Whatsminer M60S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the DragonMint T1 and Whatsminer M60S++ on J/TH?

The DragonMint T1 runs at 92.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S++ runs at 18.0 J/TH — a difference of 74.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (92.5 vs 18.0 J/TH).