Goldshell E-DG1M vs FluMiner L2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-DG1M | Specification | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 GH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| 529,411.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 230,000.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-DG1M
FluMiner L2
Based on BTC price of $78,213 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the FluMiner L2 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 87% better power draw (1,800 vs 230 W). The Goldshell E-DG1M claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell E-DG1M and FluMiner L2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-DG1M 240% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- FluMiner L2 87% better power draw (1,800 vs 230 W)
- FluMiner L2 57% better efficiency (529,412 vs 230,000 J/TH)
- FluMiner L2 11% better noise (45.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 683% more heat output (6,142 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner L2 18% more home mining score (56.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell E-DG1M | Metric | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $331 |
| -$4.32 | Daily net profit | -$0.55 |
| -$2,376 | Net after 1 year | -$533 |
| -$3,953 | Net after 2 years | -$734 |
| -$5,529 | Net after 3 years | -$936 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner L2Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner L2230,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-DG1M or FluMiner L2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner L2 is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Goldshell E-DG1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-DG1M vs FluMiner L2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The FluMiner L2 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Goldshell E-DG1M at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell E-DG1M or FluMiner L2?
The FluMiner L2 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-DG1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-DG1M and FluMiner L2?
The Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH while the FluMiner L2 runs at 230,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 299,411.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficiency (529,412 vs 230,000 J/TH).