Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.6 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 28.9 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| — | Weight | 1.1 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $77,896 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (1,800.0 vs 75.0 W). The Goldshell E-KA1M claws back ground on hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell E-KA1M and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-KA1M 112% more hashrate (5.5 vs 2.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 96% better power draw (1,800.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 91% better efficiency (327.3 vs 28.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 30% better noise (50.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 2300% more heat output (6,142 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 27% more home mining score (56.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Goldshell KD-BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.09 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$731 |
| -$3,920 | Net after 2 years | -$762 |
| -$5,425 | Net after 3 years | -$794 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Goldshell KD-BOX Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell E-KA1M or Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-KA1M at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-KA1M or the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell E-KA1M and Goldshell KD-BOX Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH — a difference of 298.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (327.3 vs 28.9 J/TH).