Goldshell Mini-DOGE III vs FluMiner L3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell Mini-DOGE III | Specification | FluMiner L3 |
|---|---|---|
| 800.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 9.5 GH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 1,700 W |
| 625,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 178,947.4 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 3.2 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
FluMiner L3
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the FluMiner L3 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1088% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III and FluMiner L3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- FluMiner L3 1088% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 71% better power draw (500 vs 1,700 W)
- FluMiner L3 71% better efficiency (625,000 vs 178,947 J/TH)
- FluMiner L3 9% better noise (55.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 75% better weight (3.2 vs 12.8 kg)
- FluMiner L3 240% more heat output (1,706 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 11% more home mining score (62.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell Mini-DOGE III | Metric | FluMiner L3 |
|---|---|---|
| $499 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,849 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$4.08 |
| -$937 | Net after 1 year | -$4,338 |
| -$1,375 | Net after 2 years | -$5,827 |
| -$1,813 | Net after 3 years | -$7,316 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner L3178,947.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III or the FluMiner L3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-4.08/day for the FluMiner L3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III or the FluMiner L3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The FluMiner L3 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III or FluMiner L3?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the FluMiner L3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell Mini-DOGE III and FluMiner L3?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH while the FluMiner L3 runs at 178,947.4 J/TH — a difference of 446,052.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficiency (625,000 vs 178,947 J/TH).