IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0 Pro
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS0 Pro edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W) in the IceRiver KS0 Pro's favour. The IceRiver KS3M holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS0 Pro and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 2900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 12% better efficiency (500 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more home mining score (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$284 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$369 | Net after 2 years | -$14,300 |
| -$454 | Net after 3 years | -$17,200 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or the IceRiver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or IceRiver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS3M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 66.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (500 vs 567 J/TH).