IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS5L | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 283.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS5L
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 85% better power draw (3,400 vs 500 W). The IceRiver KS5L claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS5L and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS5L 500% more hashrate (12.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 85% better power draw (3,400 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 12% better efficiency (283 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 67% better weight (15.0 vs 5.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 580% more heat output (11,601 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS5L | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$7.73 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$14,821 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$17,642 | Net after 2 years | -$1,282 |
| -$20,463 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS5L or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.73/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the IceRiver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS5L or the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 33.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (283 vs 250 J/TH).