Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X16-Q

Jasminer X16-Q

Hashrate 1,950.0 MH/s Power 620 W Efficiency 317,948.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2

iPollo V2

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 1,500 W Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH

Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X16-Q Specification iPollo V2
1,950.0 MH/s Hashrate 10.0 GH/s
620 W Power Consumption 1,500 W
317,948.7 J/TH Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH
40 dB Noise Level 75 dB
10.0 kg Weight 16.5 kg
2,115 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,118 BTU/hr
65/100 Home Mining Score 48/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Jasminer Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X16-Q

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$1.49
Monthly -$44.64
Yearly -$543.10

iPollo V2

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.60
Daily Profit -$3.60
Monthly -$107.99
Yearly -$1,313.88

Based on BTC price of $74,658 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2 wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The Jasminer X16-Q holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo V2 — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-Q

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2

150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V2 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-3.60/day for the iPollo V2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V2?

The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V2?

The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 48/100 for the iPollo V2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V2?

The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 167,948.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.