Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell KD Max

Goldshell KD Max

Hashrate 40.2 TH/s Power 3,350 W Efficiency 83.3 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD5

Goldshell KD5

Hashrate 18.0 TH/s Power 2,250 W Efficiency 125.0 J/TH

Goldshell KD Max vs Goldshell KD5

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD Max Specification Goldshell KD5
40.2 TH/s Hashrate 18.0 TH/s
3,350 W Power Consumption 2,250 W
83.3 J/TH Efficiency 125.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 8,500.0 kg
11,430 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,677 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithm Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD Max

Daily Revenue 0.00001850 BTC $1.45
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$6.59
Monthly -$197.76
Yearly -$2,406.13

Goldshell KD5

Daily Revenue 0.00000828 BTC $0.65
Daily Electricity -$5.40
Daily Profit -$4.75
Monthly -$142.55
Yearly -$1,734.37

Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD Max edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 123% more hashrate (40.2 vs 18.0 TH/s). The Goldshell KD5 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Goldshell KD Max — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KD Max and Goldshell KD5 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell KD Max 123% more hashrate (40.2 vs 18.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD5 33% better power draw (3,350 vs 2,250 W)
  • Goldshell KD Max 33% better efficiency (83.3 vs 125.0 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD Max 49% more heat output (11,430 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell KD5 18% more home mining score (22.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell KD Max Metric Goldshell KD5
$1,320 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,998
-$6.59 Daily net profit -$4.75
-$3,726 Net after 1 year -$3,732
-$6,132 Net after 2 years -$5,467
-$8,538 Net after 3 years -$7,201
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell KD5

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD Max

83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Goldshell KD Max or the Goldshell KD5?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD5 is more profitable at $-4.75/day compared to $-6.59/day for the Goldshell KD Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell KD Max vs Goldshell KD5: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell KD Max or the Goldshell KD5?

The Goldshell KD5 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell KD Max and Goldshell KD5 on J/TH?

The Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH while the Goldshell KD5 runs at 125.0 J/TH — a difference of 41.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficiency (83.3 vs 125.0 J/TH).