Iceriver KS1 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS1 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS1
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver KS3 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 700% more hashrate (1.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS3's favour. The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KS1 and Iceriver KS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3 700% more hashrate (1.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 81% better power draw (600 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 33% better efficiency (600 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 9% better weight (14.9 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 433% more heat output (2,047 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 22% more home mining score (44.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KS1 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$711 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$1,224 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$1,736 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KS1 or the Iceriver KS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KS1 or the Iceriver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KS1 or the Iceriver KS3?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KS1 and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 200.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficiency (600 vs 400 J/TH).