Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Baikal Miner Cube

Baikal Miner Cube

Hashrate 300.0 MH/s Power 90 W Efficiency 300,000.0 J/TH
VS
Dayun Zig D1

Dayun Zig D1

Hashrate 48.0 GH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 45,833.3 J/TH

Baikal Miner Cube vs Dayun Zig D1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal Miner Cube Specification Dayun Zig D1
300.0 MH/s Hashrate 48.0 GH/s
90 W Power Consumption 2,200 W
300,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 45,833.3 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 9,850.0 kg
307 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,506 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
Baikal Manufacturer Dayun

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal Miner Cube

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.22
Daily Profit -$0.22
Monthly -$6.48
Yearly -$78.84

Dayun Zig D1

Daily Revenue 0.00000002 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$5.28
Monthly -$158.35
Yearly -$1,926.57

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Dayun Zig D1 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 15900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Miner Cube isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Dayun Zig D1 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Baikal Miner Cube and Dayun Zig D1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Dayun Zig D1 15900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Miner Cube 96% better power draw (90.0 vs 2,200.0 W)
  • Dayun Zig D1 85% better efficiency (300,000 vs 45,833 J/TH)
  • Dayun Zig D1 2344% more heat output (307 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Miner Cube 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Baikal Miner Cube Metric Dayun Zig D1
$1,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.22 Daily net profit -$5.28
-$1,079 Net after 1 year -$1,927
-$1,158 Net after 2 years -$3,853
-$1,236 Net after 3 years -$5,780
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Miner Cube

Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Dayun Zig D1

45,833.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal Miner Cube or Dayun Zig D1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Dayun Zig D1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Baikal Miner Cube vs Dayun Zig D1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal Miner Cube or the Dayun Zig D1?

The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Dayun Zig D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Baikal Miner Cube and Dayun Zig D1?

The Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH while the Dayun Zig D1 runs at 45,833.3 J/TH — a difference of 254,166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (300,000 vs 45,833 J/TH).