Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M60S

Whatsminer M60S

Hashrate 186.0 TH/s Power 3,480 W Efficiency 18.7 J/TH

Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Whatsminer M60S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon T3+ 52T Specification Whatsminer M60S
52.0 TH/s Hashrate 186.0 TH/s
2,800 W Power Consumption 3,480 W
53.9 J/TH Efficiency 18.7 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
10,000.0 kg Weight 14.0 kg
9,554 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,874 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002393 BTC $1.89
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.83
Monthly -$144.83
Yearly -$1,762.04

Whatsminer M60S

Daily Revenue 0.00008559 BTC $6.77
Daily Electricity -$8.35
Daily Profit -$1.58
Monthly -$47.48
Yearly -$577.69

Based on BTC price of $79,086 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M60S edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 258% more hashrate (52.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T3+ 52T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M60S — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon T3+ 52T and Whatsminer M60S sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M60S 258% more hashrate (52.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 20% better power draw (2,800 vs 3,480 W)
  • Whatsminer M60S 65% better efficiency (53.9 vs 18.7 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M60S 100% better weight (10,000.0 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Whatsminer M60S 24% more heat output (9,554 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M60S 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon T3+ 52T Metric Whatsminer M60S
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,500
-$4.83 Daily net profit -$1.58
-$1,762 Net after 1 year -$6,078
-$3,524 Net after 2 years -$6,655
-$5,286 Net after 3 years -$7,233
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M60S

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M60S

18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon T3+ 52T or the Whatsminer M60S?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-1.58/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon T3+ 52T or the Whatsminer M60S better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon T3+ 52T or Whatsminer M60S?

The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon T3+ 52T and Whatsminer M60S?

The Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 35.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (53.9 vs 18.7 J/TH).