iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 475 W |
| 846,153.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 751 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2H wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1208% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo V2H's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and iPollo V2H actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V2H 1208% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 54% better power draw (220 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 83% better efficiency (846,154 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 38% better noise (40.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 73% better weight (2.1 vs 7.9 kg)
- iPollo V2H 116% more heat output (751 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 20% more home mining score (66.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $650 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$0.53 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$843 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$1,035 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$1,228 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or iPollo V2H more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-1.14/day for the iPollo V2H. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs iPollo V2H: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2H at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or the iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 55/100 for the iPollo V2H). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 706,448.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (846,154 vs 139,706 J/TH).