iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.8 GH/s |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 1,900 W |
| 785,714.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 751 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-P wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1971% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-P's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 and Jasminer X16-P sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-P 1971% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 88% better power draw (220 vs 1,900 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 58% better efficiency (785,714 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 85% better weight (2.1 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 764% more heat output (751 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 136% more home mining score (66.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$0.53 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$893 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$1,085 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$1,278 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or the Jasminer X16-P?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 or the Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 and Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 280 runs at 785,714.3 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 458,128.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (785,714 vs 327,586 J/TH).