Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Jasminer X4 3U-Z

Jasminer X4 3U-Z

Hashrate 840.0 MH/s Power 340 W Efficiency 404,761.9 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X4-C 1U

Jasminer X4-C 1U

Hashrate 450.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 533,333.3 J/TH

Jasminer X4 3U-Z vs Jasminer X4-C 1U

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X4 3U-Z Specification Jasminer X4-C 1U
840.0 MH/s Hashrate 450.0 MH/s
340 W Power Consumption 240 W
404,761.9 J/TH Efficiency 533,333.3 J/TH
Noise Level
12.0 kg Weight
1,160 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithm Etchash
Jasminer Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X4 3U-Z

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.82
Daily Profit -$0.82
Monthly -$24.48
Yearly -$297.83

Jasminer X4-C 1U

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.23

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4 3U-Z, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 87% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Jasminer X4-C 1U isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Jasminer X4 3U-Z — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X4 3U-Z and Jasminer X4-C 1U sit on each measurable spec:

  • Jasminer X4 3U-Z 87% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X4-C 1U 29% better power draw (340 vs 240 W)
  • Jasminer X4 3U-Z 24% better efficiency (404,762 vs 533,333 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X4 3U-Z 42% more heat output (1,160 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X4 3U-Z 10% more home mining score (34.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Jasminer X4 3U-Z Metric Jasminer X4-C 1U
$1,299 Upfront cost (MSRP) $658
-$0.82 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,597 Net after 1 year -$868
-$1,895 Net after 2 years -$1,078
-$2,192 Net after 3 years -$1,289
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X4 3U-Z

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X4 3U-Z

404,761.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Jasminer X4 3U-Z or Jasminer X4-C 1U more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-C 1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-0.82/day for the Jasminer X4 3U-Z. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Jasminer X4 3U-Z or Jasminer X4-C 1U?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Jasminer X4 3U-Z vs Jasminer X4-C 1U: which fits a residential setup better?

The Jasminer X4 3U-Z scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4-C 1U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Jasminer X4 3U-Z vs Jasminer X4-C 1U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Jasminer X4 3U-Z runs at 404,761.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-C 1U runs at 533,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 128,571.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficiency (404,762 vs 533,333 J/TH).