Antminer K7 vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 59/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer K7 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 5948% more hashrate (63.5 vs 1.1 TH/s). The Goldshell CK-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer K7 and Goldshell CK-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer K7 5948% more hashrate (63.5 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 93% better power draw (3,080 vs 215 W)
- Antminer K7 76% better efficacité (48.5 vs 204.8 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 86% better weight (14.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Antminer K7 1333% more heat output (10,509 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 59.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$5.56 | Daily net profit | -$0.49 |
| -$5,528 | Net after 1 year | -$576 |
| -$7,557 | Net after 2 years | -$754 |
| -$9,585 | Net after 3 years | -$931 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer K748.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer K7 or Goldshell CK-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.49/day compared to $-5.56/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer K7 or Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer K7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer K7 or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer K7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer K7 vs Goldshell CK-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 156.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (48.5 vs 204.8 J/TH).