Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer KS5 Pro

Antminer KS5 Pro

Taux de hachage 21.0 TH/s Puissance 3,150 W Efficiency 150.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KS5L

Iceriver KS5L

Taux de hachage 12.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 283.3 J/TH

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Iceriver KS5L

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer KS5 Pro Specification Iceriver KS5L
21.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 12.0 TH/s
3,150 W Consommation électrique 3,400 W
150.0 J/TH Efficiency 283.3 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 15.0 kg
10,748 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer KS5 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000950 BTC $0.60
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$6.96
Monthly -$208.78
Yearly -$2,540.21

Iceriver KS5L

Daily Revenue 0.00000543 BTC $0.34
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.82
Monthly -$234.51
Yearly -$2,853.15

Based on BTC price of $63,208 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS5 Pro edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 47% better efficacité (150 vs 283 J/TH). That said, the Iceriver KS5L isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer KS5 Pro — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS5 Pro and Iceriver KS5L sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer KS5 Pro 75% more hashrate (21.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 7% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,400 W)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 47% better efficacité (150 vs 283 J/TH)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 3% better weight (14.5 vs 15.0 kg)
  • Iceriver KS5L 8% more heat output (10,748 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer KS5 Pro Metric Iceriver KS5L
$15,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $400
-$6.96 Daily net profit -$7.82
-$17,540 Net after 1 year -$3,253
-$20,080 Net after 2 years -$6,106
-$22,621 Net after 3 years -$8,959
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer KS5 Pro

150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer KS5 Pro or Iceriver KS5L more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 Pro is more profitable at $-6.96/day compared to $-7.82/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Iceriver KS5L: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS5 Pro or Iceriver KS5L?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer KS5 Pro and Iceriver KS5L?

The Antminer KS5 Pro runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 133.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (150 vs 283 J/TH).