Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer K7

Antminer K7

Taux de hachage 63.5 TH/s Puissance 3,080 W Efficiency 48.5 J/TH
VS
Antminer KS5 Pro

Antminer KS5 Pro

Taux de hachage 21.0 TH/s Puissance 3,150 W Efficiency 150.0 J/TH

Antminer K7 vs Antminer KS5 Pro

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer K7 Specification Antminer KS5 Pro
63.5 TH/s Taux de hachage 21.0 TH/s
3,080 W Consommation électrique 3,150 W
48.5 J/TH Efficiency 150.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.0 kg Weight 14.5 kg
10,509 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,748 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer K7

Daily Revenue 0.00002922 BTC $2.29
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.18
Yearly -$1,863.73

Antminer KS5 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000966 BTC $0.76
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$6.80
Monthly -$204.12
Yearly -$2,483.47

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer K7 l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 68% better efficacité (48.5 vs 150.0 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer K7 — l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer K7 and Antminer KS5 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer K7 202% more hashrate (63.5 vs 21.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer K7 2% better power draw (3,080 vs 3,150 W)
  • Antminer K7 68% better efficacité (48.5 vs 150.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer K7 3% better weight (14.0 vs 14.5 kg)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 2% more heat output (10,509 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer K7 Metric Antminer KS5 Pro
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $15,000
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$6.80
-$5,364 Net after 1 year -$17,483
-$7,227 Net after 2 years -$19,967
-$9,091 Net after 3 years -$22,450
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer K7

48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer K7 or Antminer KS5 Pro more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer K7 is more profitable at $-5.11/day compared to $-6.80/day for the Antminer KS5 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer K7 or the Antminer KS5 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer K7 vs Antminer KS5 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer K7 and Antminer KS5 Pro?

The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Antminer KS5 Pro runs at 150.0 J/TH — a difference of 101.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (48.5 vs 150.0 J/TH).