Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer KS5 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer KS5 Pro is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Antminer E9 Pro runs 3,680.0 MH/s; the Antminer KS5 Pro runs 21.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer KS5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 21.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,150 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 150.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,748 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer KS5 Pro
Based on BTC price of $64,648 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS5 Pro edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 570552% more hashrate (0.0 vs 21.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer KS5 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer KS5 Pro 570552% more hashrate (0.0 vs 21.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 30% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,150 W)
- Antminer KS5 Pro 100% better efficacité (597,826 vs 150 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 2% better weight (14.2 vs 14.5 kg)
- Antminer KS5 Pro 43% more heat output (7,506 vs 10,748 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer KS5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $15,000 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$6.88 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$17,510 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$20,020 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$22,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 11/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5 Pro150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer KS5 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-6.88/day for the Antminer KS5 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer KS5 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer KS5 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer KS5 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer KS5 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer KS5 Pro runs at 150.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,676.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826 vs 150 J/TH).