Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs 14.0 TH/s at 96.4 J/TH; the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition runs 12.0 TH/s at 91.7 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 1,100 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 91.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 8.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,753 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
Based on BTC price of $64,958 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 19% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,100 W). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 17% more hashrate (14.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition 19% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,100 W)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition 5% better efficacité (96.4 vs 91.7 J/TH)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition 9% better noise (55.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 25% better weight (6.0 vs 8.0 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 23% more heat output (4,606 vs 3,753 BTU/hr)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition 19% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$2.78 | Daily net profit | -$2.25 |
| -$1,365 | Net after 1 year | -$1,319 |
| -$2,380 | Net after 2 years | -$2,140 |
| -$3,396 | Net after 3 years | -$2,960 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitcoin Space Heater S9 EditionScore: 70/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition91.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition is more profitable at $-2.25/day compared to $-2.78/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition?
The Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 4.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (96.4 vs 91.7 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Loki Edition (S9) with...
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater S19 Edition
Compare Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition with...
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Antminer S9
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S19 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater L3 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)