Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 126.0 TH/s |
| 2,385 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50S, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 138% more hashrate (53.0 vs 126.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Whatsminer M50S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50S 138% more hashrate (53.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 27% better power draw (2,385 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 42% better efficacité (45.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 26% better weight (9.5 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 37% more heat output (8,138 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S 38% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$4.19 | Daily net profit | -$4.22 |
| -$1,804 | Net after 1 year | -$4,741 |
| -$3,334 | Net after 2 years | -$6,282 |
| -$4,865 | Net after 3 years | -$7,822 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) is more profitable at $-4.19/day compared to $-4.22/day for the Whatsminer M50S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Whatsminer M50S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Whatsminer M50S?
The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Whatsminer M50S on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (45.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).