Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.0 TH/s |
| 5,644 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 10967% more hashrate (332.0 vs 3.0 TH/s). The Bitaxe Hex claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and Bitaxe Hex diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 10967% more hashrate (332.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 98% better power draw (5,644.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 43% better efficacité (17.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 18% better noise (55.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Hex 96% better weight (12.8 vs 0.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 6171% more heat output (19,257 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Hex 45% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$3.95 | Daily net profit | -$0.13 |
| -$3,241 | Net after 1 year | -$446 |
| -$4,684 | Net after 2 years | -$493 |
| -$6,126 | Net after 3 years | -$541 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe HexScore: 64/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or the Bitaxe Hex?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-3.95/day for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Bitaxe Hex: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Bitaxe Hex: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Hex scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Bitaxe Hex: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 13.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (17.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).