Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S7

Bitmain Antminer S7

Taux de hachage 4.7 TH/s Puissance 1,293 W Efficiency 273.4 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s Puissance 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Bitaxe GT

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S7 Specification Bitaxe GT
4.7 TH/s Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s
1,293 W Consommation électrique 75 W
273.4 J/TH Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 42 dB
3.9 kg Weight 0.4 kg
4,412 BTU/hr BTU Output 256 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 64/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S7

Daily Revenue 0.00000214 BTC $0.13
Daily Electricity -$3.10
Daily Profit -$2.97
Monthly -$89.06
Yearly -$1,083.60

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000226 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit -$0.04
Monthly -$1.14
Yearly -$13.83

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe GT edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 95% better efficacité (273.4 vs 15.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Bitaxe GT actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitaxe GT 6% more hashrate (4.7 vs 5.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 94% better power draw (1,293.0 vs 75.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 95% better efficacité (273.4 vs 15.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 90% better weight (3.9 vs 0.4 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer S7 1624% more heat output (4,412 vs 256 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 106% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 64.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitmain Antminer S7 Metric Bitaxe GT
Upfront cost (MSRP) $499
-$2.97 Daily net profit -$0.04
-$1,084 Net after 1 year -$513
-$2,167 Net after 2 years -$527
-$3,251 Net after 3 years -$540
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer S7 or Bitaxe GT more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-2.97/day for the Bitmain Antminer S7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S7 or the Bitaxe GT better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S7 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S7 or the Bitaxe GT?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S7 and Bitaxe GT?

The Bitmain Antminer S7 runs at 273.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 258.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (273.4 vs 15.0 J/TH).