Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,027 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.8 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 3.1 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,504 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 200% more hashrate (12.0 vs 4.0 TH/s) in the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 200% more hashrate (12.0 vs 4.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) 7% better power draw (1,100 vs 1,027 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 64% better efficacité (91.7 vs 256.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) 11% better weight (3.5 vs 3.1 kg)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 7% more heat output (3,753 vs 3,504 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 68% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.30 | Daily net profit | -$2.35 |
| -$1,189 | Net after 1 year | -$858 |
| -$2,028 | Net after 2 years | -$1,716 |
| -$2,866 | Net after 3 years | -$2,574 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)91.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-2.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer V9 (4Th) runs at 256.8 J/TH — a difference of 165.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (91.7 vs 256.8 J/TH).