Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | GMO miner B2 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 24.0 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,950 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 81.3 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,653 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | GMO miner |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
GMO miner B2
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the GMO miner B2 edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 100% more hashrate (12.0 vs 24.0 TH/s) in the GMO miner B2's favour. The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and GMO miner B2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- GMO miner B2 100% more hashrate (12.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 44% better power draw (1,100 vs 1,950 W)
- GMO miner B2 11% better efficacité (91.7 vs 81.3 J/TH)
- GMO miner B2 77% more heat output (3,753 vs 6,653 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 86% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | GMO miner B2 |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.30 | Daily net profit | -$3.99 |
| -$1,189 | Net after 1 year | -$1,458 |
| -$2,027 | Net after 2 years | -$2,916 |
| -$2,866 | Net after 3 years | -$4,374 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
GMO miner B281.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or GMO miner B2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.30/day compared to $-3.99/day for the GMO miner B2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs GMO miner B2: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and GMO miner B2 on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH — a difference of 10.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficacité (91.7 vs 81.3 J/TH).