Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Avalon A1246
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Specification | Avalon A1246 |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,420 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 12.3 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Avalon A1246
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1246, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 41% more hashrate (64.0 vs 90.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and Avalon A1246 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1246 41% more hashrate (64.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,420 W)
- Avalon A1246 24% better efficacité (50.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 19% better weight (10.0 vs 12.3 kg)
- Avalon A1246 7% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1246 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Metric | Avalon A1246 |
|---|---|---|
| $75 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$5.85 | Daily net profit | -$5.64 |
| -$2,211 | Net after 1 year | -$3,858 |
| -$4,348 | Net after 2 years | -$5,917 |
| -$6,484 | Net after 3 years | -$7,975 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1246Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A124638.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or the Avalon A1246?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1246 is more profitable at $-5.64/day compared to $-5.85/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or Avalon A1246?
The Avalon A1246 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Avalon A1246: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1246 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Avalon A1246: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 12.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (50.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).