Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) vs Avalon A1446
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Specification | Avalon A1446 |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 135.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,310 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 24.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,294 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Avalon A1446
Based on BTC price of $73,512 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1446 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 111% more hashrate (64.0 vs 135.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and Avalon A1446 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1446 111% more hashrate (64.0 vs 135.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 3% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,310 W)
- Avalon A1446 51% better efficacité (50.0 vs 24.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 22% better weight (10.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- Avalon A1446 3% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,294 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1446 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) | Metric | Avalon A1446 |
|---|---|---|
| $75 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$5.55 | Daily net profit | -$3.45 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 1 year | -$4,461 |
| -$4,128 | Net after 2 years | -$5,722 |
| -$6,154 | Net after 3 years | -$6,982 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1446Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A144624.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or Avalon A1446 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1446 is more profitable at $-3.45/day compared to $-5.55/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or the Avalon A1446 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Avalon A1446 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) or the Avalon A1446?
The Avalon A1446 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) and Avalon A1446?
The Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH — a difference of 25.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficacité (50.0 vs 24.5 J/TH).