Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer T17+

Antminer T17+

Taux de hachage 64.0 TH/s Puissance 3,200 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
VS
Nerdminer

Nerdminer

Taux de hachage 50.0 KH/s Puissance 1 W Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH

Antminer T17+ vs Nerdminer

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer T17+ Specification Nerdminer
64.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 KH/s
3,200 W Consommation électrique 1 W
50.0 J/TH Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
10.0 kg Weight 0.1 kg
10,918 BTU/hr BTU Output 3 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 35/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer T17+

Daily Revenue 0.00002895 BTC $1.85
Daily Electricity -$7.68
Daily Profit -$5.83
Monthly -$174.81
Yearly -$2,126.83

Nerdminer

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.00
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.07
Yearly -$0.88

Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer T17+ l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 127999999900% more hashrate (64.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Nerdminer holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer T17+ — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer T17+ and Nerdminer sit on each measurable spec:

  • Antminer T17+ 127999999900% more hashrate (64.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Nerdminer 100% better power draw (3,200.0 vs 1.0 W)
  • Antminer T17+ 100% better efficacité (50.0 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH)
  • Nerdminer 100% better weight (10.0 vs 0.1 kg)
  • Antminer T17+ 321029% more heat output (10,918.4 vs 3.4 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer T17+ 140% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 35.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer T17+ Metric Nerdminer
Upfront cost (MSRP) $29
-$5.83 Daily net profit -$0.00
-$2,127 Net after 1 year -$30
-$4,254 Net after 2 years -$31
-$6,381 Net after 3 years -$32
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T17+

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T17+

50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer T17+ or the Nerdminer?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Nerdminer is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.83/day for the Antminer T17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer T17+ or the Nerdminer better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer T17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Nerdminer at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer T17+ vs Nerdminer: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 35/100 for the Nerdminer). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer T17+ and Nerdminer on J/TH?

The Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Nerdminer runs at 20,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 19,999,950.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (50.0 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH).